Excerpt
(Excerpted from Supreme Court Debates, February 2008)
Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court heard a case involving a
State voter ID law that may or may not effectively and constitutionally
address in-person voter fraud, a problem that, according to what little
research has been done on the issue, may or may not even exist. The
Court must now sort through the conflicting facts and determine what
standard to use when weighing the possible benefits and harms of this
law before issuing its decision on a subject that has been the focus of
highly partisan battles in numerous States.
The law in
question was passed …
In This Issue
-
Foreword
Read More -
Indiana’s Voter ID Law
Requirements of the State Legislation
Read More -
Lower Court Holding
Decision of the Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals
Read More -
Before the Court
The Justices Weigh in During Oral Arguments
Read More -
Opinion of the Court
Mandatory Voter Identification Laws Are Constitutional
Read More
Pro & Con
Does the Indiana Law Requiring Voters to Show Photo Identification Violate the Constitution?
Pro
-
Cyber Privacy Project, Privacy Journal, Privacy Activism, Liberty Coalition, U.S. Bill of Rights Foundation, Robbin Stewart, and Joell Palmer
Read More -
Indiana Democratic Party, et al.
Read More -
AARP and National Senior Citizens Law Center
Read More -
The Brennan Center for Justice, Demos: A Network for Ideas & Action, Project Vote, People for the American Way Foundation, and Lorraine C. Minnite
Read More
Con
-
Todd Rokita, et al.
Read More -
United States
Read More -
Georgia Secretary of State Karen C. Handel
Read More -
U.S. Senators Mitch McConnell (KY-R), Robert Bennett (UT-R), and Christopher S. “Kit” Bond (MO-R) and Representatives Roy Blunt (MO-R), Lamar Smith (TX-R), and Vernon Ehlers (MI-R)
Read More -
Republican National Committee
Read More
