Congressional Digest

Supreme Court Debates March 2012 No. 3 Vol. 15
Non-Factual Speech

The Stolen Valor Act

First Amendment Protection of False Speech

Buy Complete Issue$19.95

Non-Factual Speech

Government Restraint on Content of Expression

As a general matter, government may not regulate speech “because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content.” — Police Department v. Mosley (1972). Invalid content regulation includes not only restrictions on particular viewpoints, but also prohibitions on public discussion of an entire topic. Originally, the Court took a “two-tier” approach to content-oriented regulation of expression. Under the “definitional balancing” of this approach, some forms of expression are protected by the First Amendment and certain categories of expression are not entitled to protection. This doctrine traces to Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire (1942), in which the Court opined…

More on The Stolen Valor Act:

Also In This Issue:

Back to top ↑
X
Username
Password

Email Address
Email Address Again
Forgot username/password?