Excerpt
When convicted criminals are sentenced to prison, many of their freedoms are relinquished. They are told where to sleep, when to eat, and what to do. One freedom they maintain, however, is the freedom to practice their religion.
By passing the Federal Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 (RLUIPA), Congress instructed prison administrators to accommodate inmates’ religious practices. The law says that “substantial burdens” on a prisoner’s religion can only be justified if it is the “least restrictive means” of furthering a “compelling” government interest.
For most Sta…
Buy Full Issue$19.95In This Issue
-
Foreword
Read More -
Inside the Court
Whistleblower Protection, Pregnancy Discrimination, and Religious Freedom on the Docket
Read More -
Institutionalized Persons and Religion
Overview of Enforcement of Federal Laws
Read More -
Lower Court Holding in Holt v. Hobbs
Decision of the Eighth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals
Read More -
PRO: Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, et al., Respondents
Christine A. Cryer, Counsel of Record
Read More -
PRO: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, et al., Amici Curiae
Andrew L. Brasher, Counsel of Record
Read More -
CON: Gregory Houston Holt, AKA Abdul Maalik Muhammad, Petitioner
Douglas Laycock, Counsel of Record
Read More -
CON: United States of America, Amicus Curiae
Donald B. Verrilli, U.S. Solicitor General
Read More -
CON: American Jewish Committee, Union for Reform Judaism, et al., Amici Curiae
Marc D. Stern, Counsel of Record
Read More -
Before the Court in Holt v. Hobbs
The Justices Weigh in on Prison Beard Prohibitions
Read More