Congressional Digest

Supreme Court Debates January 2019 No. 1 Vol. 22
Before the Court in Gamble v. United States

Double Jeopardy

Constitutional Limits on Multiple Prosecutions

Buy Complete Issue$19.95

Before the Court in Gamble v. United States

The Justices Weigh in on Double Jeopardy Protection

At 10:04a.m. on December 6, 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments for case No. 17-646, Terance Martez Gamble v. United States. At 11:24 a.m. the case arguments concluded, and the case was submitted for judgment. Following are excerpts from the arguments of Louis. A. Chaiten on behalf of the Petitioner and Eric J. Feignin, assistant to the U.S. solicitor general, on behalf of the Respondent. Questions are from the nine Supreme Court justices. Argument on behalf of Terance Martez Gamble JUSTICE KAGAN: I suppose my main question, which actually goes back to Justice Gorsuch’s question, because Justice Gorsuch…

More on Double Jeopardy:

Back to top ↑
X
Username
Password

Email Address
Email Address Again
Forgot username/password?