Congressional Digest

Congressional Digest May 2005 No. 5 Vol. 84
Filibusters of Judicial Nominations

Judicial Nominations

The Debate Over the "Nuclear Option"

Buy Complete Issue$19.95

Filibusters of Judicial Nominations

Analysis of Constitutional Issues

The Senate cloture rule (Rule 22, paragraph 2) requires a super-majority vote to terminate a filibuster (i.e., extended debate). The Appointments Clause of the Constitution, which provides that the President is to "nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate … appoint" judges, does not impose a super-majority for Senate confirmation. Since it has the effect of requiring a super-majority vote on a nomination, because it usually requires the votes of 60 Senators to end a filibuster, it has been argued that a filibuster of a judicial nomination is unconstitutional. In the absence of (a) any…

More on Judicial Nominations:

Back to top ↑
X
Username
Password

Email Address
Email Address Again
Forgot username/password?