Excerpt
The Heald, et al. v. Michigan case has become a showdown involving wholesalers and many State legislatures, who want protectionism; and wineries, wine-producing States, and interstate shipping companies who are fighting for opening the market.
In This Issue
-
Foreword
Read More -
Inside the Supreme Court
Status of Important Cases Before the Highest Tribunal
Read More -
The Twenty-First Amendment
Supreme Court Case Law Relating to Alcohol Regulation
Read More -
Lower Court Holding
Decision of the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals
Read More -
Before the Court
The Justices Weigh in During Oral Arguments
Read More
Pro & Con
Can States Prohibit Out-of-State Vendors From Direct-Selling Alcohol to Individuals Within Their Borders?
Pro
-
Michigan Association of Secondary School Principals, Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow, et al.
-
Illinois Alcohol and Drug Dependence Association
-
States of Ohio, Alabama, Arkansas, Connecticut,
Delaware, Florida, Georgia, et al.
-
National Beer Wholesalers Association (NBWA)
-
Jennifer Granholm, et al.
Con
-
Eleanor Heald, et al.
-
States of California, Washington, New Mexico, Oregon, and West Virginia
-
WineAmerica, Coalition for Free Trade, Family of Winemakers of California, et al.
-
American Homeowners Alliance, American Legislative Exchange Council, et al.
-
George A. Akerlof, Daniel L. McFadden, Vernon L. Smith, Donald J. Boudreaux, Robert W. Hahn, et al.
