Congressional Digest

Supreme Court Debates January 2003 No. 1 Vol. 6
Before the Court

Abortion Protests as Extortion

Use of Federal Antiracketeering Law Against Demonstrators

Before the Court

The Justices Weigh in During Oral Arguments

At 10:06 a.m. on December 4, 2002, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments for case number 01-1119, Joseph Scheidler, et al. v. National Organization for Women, et al. At 11:07 p.m., arguments concluded and the case was submitted for judgment. Following are excerpts from the arguments of Roy T. Englert, Jr., attorney for the Petitioners, and Fay Clayton, attorney for the Respondents. Questions are presented from the nine Supreme Court justices. Argument on Behalf of Scheidler, et al. MR. ENGLERT: Now, the reason why there should be reversal for the entry of judgment for the Defendants is that Respondents…

Back to top ↑
X
Username
Password

Email Address
Email Address Again
Forgot username/password?