Congressional Digest

Supreme Court Debates December 2008 No. 10 Vol. 11
Opinion of the Court

Broadcast Indecency

The Networks Challenge the FCC

Opinion of the Court

The FCC Adequately Explained Why It Ruled That "Fleeting and Isolated Utterances" of Explicit Content Are Prohibited on television

The FCC’s orders are neither "arbitrary" nor "capricious" within the meaning of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). Under the APA standard, an agency must "examine the relevant data and articulate a satisfactory explanation for its action." — Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association of the United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. (1983). In overturning the FCC’s judgment, the Second Circuit relied in part on its precedent interpreting the APA and State Farm to require a more substantial explanation for agency action that changes prior policy. There is, however, no basis in the Act or this Court’s opinions for…

More on Broadcast Indecency:

Back to top ↑
X
Username
Password

Email Address
Email Address Again
Forgot username/password?