Congressional Digest

Supreme Court Debates April 2014 No. 4 Vol. 17
Before the Court in Schuette v. BAMN

Color-blind College Admissions

State Attempts to Ban Race-based Preferences

Buy Complete Issue$19.95

Before the Court in Schuette v. BAMN

The Justices Weigh in on Banning Racial Preferences

At 1:00 p.m. on October 15, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments for case number 12–682, Bill Schuette, et al. v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, Integration and Immigrant Rights and Fight for Equality by Any Means Necessary (BAMN), et al. At 2:0 p.m., arguments concluded and the case was submitted for judgment. Following are excerpts from the arguments of John J. Bursch, solicitor general for the State of Michigan, and Shanta Driver, counsel of record for BAMN, et al. Questions are presented from eight Supreme Court Justices. Justice Kagan has recused herself in this case. Argument on…

More on Color-blind College Admissions:

Back to top ↑
X
Username
Password

Email Address
Email Address Again
Forgot username/password?