Congressional Digest

Supreme Court Debates September 2019 No. 6 Vol. 22
Opinion of the Court in Rucho v. Common Cause

Political Gerrymandering

Judicial Review of Partisan Redistricting

Buy Complete Issue$19.95

Opinion of the Court in Rucho v. Common Cause

Partisan Gerrymandering Is Not Subject to Judicial Review

Voters and other plaintiffs in North Carolina and Maryland challenged their States’ congressional districting maps as unconstitutional partisan gerrymanders. The North Carolina Plaintiffs complained that the State’s districting plan discriminated against Democrats; the Maryland Plaintiffs complained that their State’s plan discriminated against Republicans. The Plaintiffs alleged that the gerrymandering violated the First Amendment, the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, the Elections Clause, and Article I, Section 2, of the Constitution. The district courts in both cases ruled in favor of the Plaintiffs, and the Defendants appealed directly to this Court. These cases require us to consider once again…

More on Political Gerrymandering:

Back to top ↑
X
Username
Password

Email Address
Email Address Again
Forgot username/password?