Congressional Digest

Supreme Court Debates April 2016 No. 4 Vol. 19
Before the Court in Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt

Regulating Abortion Providers

Women’s Health and the “Undue Burden” Standard

Buy Complete Issue$19.95

Before the Court in Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt

The Justices Weigh in on Abortion Clinic Regulation

At 10:03 a.m. on March 2, 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments for case number 15–274, Whole Woman’s Health et al. v. John Hellerstedt et al. At 11:28 p.m., arguments concluded and the case was submitted for judgment. Following are excerpts from the arguments of Stephanie Toti, representing Whole Woman’s Health, et al., and Scott A. Keller, representing the John Hellerstedt, et al. Questions are presented from the nine Supreme Court justices. Argument on Behalf of Whole Woman’s Health et al. MS. TOTI: So fundamentally, these laws impose heavy burdens on abortion access that are not medically justified. And…

More on Regulating Abortion Providers:

Back to top ↑
X
Username
Password

Email Address
Email Address Again
Forgot username/password?