Congressional Digest

Supreme Court Debates November 2003 No. 8 Vol. 6
Before the Court

Regulating Campaign Fundraising

The Constitutionality of McCain-Feingold's "Soft Money" Ban

Before the Court

The Justices Weigh in During Oral Arguments

At 10:00 a.m. on September 8, 2003, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments for case number 02-1674, Mitch McConnell, et al. v. Federal Election Commission (FEC), et al. At 3:55 p.m., arguments concluded and the case was submitted for judgment. Following are excerpts from the arguments of Kenneth W. Starr, attorney for McConnell, et al., and Theodore B. Olson, U.S. Solicitor General representing FEC, et al. Questions are presented from the nine Supreme Court justices. Argument on Behalf of Mitch McConnell, et al. MR. STARR: Title I of BCRA [Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act], along with Section 213, intrudes deeply…

More on Regulating Campaign Fundraising:

Back to top ↑
X
Username
Password

Email Address
Email Address Again
Forgot username/password?