Congressional Digest

Supreme Court Debates November 2014 No. 8 Vol. 17
Lower Court Holding in Holt v. Hobbs

Religious Freedom Behind Bars

The Legality of a Prison’s No-Beard Policy

Buy Complete Issue$19.95

Lower Court Holding in Holt v. Hobbs

Decision of the Eighth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals

In this action challenging the Arkansas Department of Correction (ADC) grooming policy under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA), inmate Gregory Holt (also known as Abdul Maalik Muhammad) appeals the district court’s order dismissing his action after an evidentiary hearing. In his complaint and motion for a preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order, Holt asserted that one of his fundamentalist Muslim beliefs was that he must grow a beard, but defendants substantially burdened his ability to practice his religion by enforcing ADC’s grooming policy, which allowed trimmed mustaches but otherwise no facial hair, with quarter-inch beards permitted…

More on Religious Freedom Behind Bars:

Back to top ↑
X
Username
Password

Email Address
Email Address Again
Forgot username/password?