Excerpt
In 39 States, voters are involved in deciding who serves on their State courts. While proponents of this process contend that it makes judges more accountable, others argue it unduly tarnishes what should be an independent Judicial Branch with partisan politics.
This conflict between democracy and the potential for corruption is on particular display in the days leading up to judicial elections, when candidates appeal to voters for support.
In order to avoid the most direct appearance of impropriety, 30 States have ethical guidelines that prohibit judicial office-seekers from directly asking for campaign …
Buy Full Issue$19.95In This Issue
-
Foreword
Read More -
Inside the Court
Gay Marriage, Religious Freedom, and Health Care Reform on the Docket
Read More -
Campaign Finance Reform
Buckley v. Valeo and Free-Speech Exceptions
Read More -
Lower Court Holding in Florida Bar v. Williams-Yulee
Decision of the Florida Supreme Court
Read More -
Before the Court in Williams-Yulee v. Florida Bar
The Justices Weigh in on Judicial Campaign Speech
Read More
Pro & Con
Is a State Rule Prohibiting Judicial Candidates From Directly Soliciting Campaign Contributions Unconstitutional?
