Congressional Digest

Supreme Court Debates December 2001 No. 9 Vol. 4
Affirmative Action and the Courts

Minority Hiring Preferences

The Constitutionality of Federal Affirmative Action

Affirmative Action and the Courts

Overview of Constitutional Challenges to Racial Preferences

Not until 1989 did a majority of the Supreme Court justices resolve the proper constitutional standard for review of governmental classifications by race enacted for a remedial or other "benign" legislative purpose. Disputes prior to City of Richmond v. J.A. Croson (1989) yielded divergent views as to whether State affirmative action measures for the benefit of racial minorities were subject to the same "strict scrutiny" as applied to "invidious" racial discrimination under the Equal Protection Clause, an "intermediate" standard resembling the test for gender-based classifications, or simple rationality. In Croson, a 5-to-4 majority settled on strict scrutiny to invalidate a…

More on Minority Hiring Preferences:

Back to top ↑
X
Username
Password

Email Address
Email Address Again
Forgot username/password?