Excerpt
The Sixth Circuit US Court of Appeals ruled the University of Michigan’s Law School admission’s policies were constitutional. Petitioner’s argued the policy violates civil rights law and the 14th amendment.
In This Issue
-
Foreword
Read More -
Inside the Supreme Court
Status of Important Cases Before the Highest Tribunal
Read More -
Bakke and its Progeny
Court Review of Racial Preferences in Student Admissions
Read More -
Lower Court Holding
Decision of the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals
Read More -
Before the Court
The Justices Weigh in During Oral Arguments
Read More
Pro & Con
Does the University of Michigan Law School's Program of Racial Preferences in Admissions Violate the Constitution?
Pro
Con
-
Lee Bollinger, Jeffrey Lehman, Dennis Shields, and the Board of Regents of the University of Michigan
-
Maryland, New York, Arizona, California, et
al.
-
Columbia University, Cornell University, Georgetown University, Rice University, and Vanderbilt University
-
United Negro College Fund (UNCF) and Kappa Alpha Psi
-
Lt. Gen. Julius W. Becton, Jr., Adm. Dennis Blair, Maj. Gen. Charles Bolden,
et al.
-
United States
-
Senators Thomas A. Daschle (SD-D), Edward
M. Kennedy (MA-D), Hillary Rodham
Clinton (NY-D), et al.
-
General Motors Corporation
