Stopping taxpayer funding of abortions versus expanded care access
As lawmakers negotiated annual government spending bills this summer and fall, federal funding for abortions emerged as a contentious issue. Democrats pushed for the removal of an annual appropriations rider known as the Hyde Amendment, which prohibits federal funding for abortions, while Republicans said they were committed to keeping it on the books. …
Representative, California, Democrat
Read MorePresident and CEO, Physicians for Reproductive Health
Read MoreChancellor’s Professor of Law, University of California, Irvine School of Law
Read MoreRepresentative, Washington, Republican
Read MoreRepresentative, New Jersey, Republican
Read MoreCatherine Glenn Foster, President and CEO
Read MoreRoe v. Wade led to years of litigation over abortion access
Read MoreApproximately 18% of pregnancies end in induced abortion
Read MoreA national report found that access to care depends on state rules
Read MoreHow a Trump-era rule limited access to women’s health care
Read MoreAs states enact restrictions, Democrats look to cement Roe v. Wade
Read MoreStopping taxpayer funding of abortions versus expanded care access
Read MoreGreater security for EU energy versus emboldening Russia
Read MoreStopping taxpayer funding of abortions versus expanded care access
Read MoreGreater security for EU energy versus emboldening Russia
Read More©2024 By The Congressional Digest Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
