Opinion of the Court in Riley v. California
Warrantless Cellphone Searches Are Unconstitutional
Protecting Digital Information From Warrantless Inspection
Buy Complete Issue$19.95Warrantless Cellphone Searches Are Unconstitutional
The Court Rules That Town Councils Can Begin Meetings With Christian Prayers
Read MoreThe Court Rules That the Chemical Weapons Convention Does Not Apply to a Woman Poisoning Her Husband
Read MoreThe Court Rules That 35-foot Buffer Zones Around Reproductive Health Facilities Are Unconstitutional
Read MoreThe Court Rules That Short Inter-session Recess Appointments by the President Are Unconstitutional
Read MoreThe Court Rules That the Affordable Care Act’s Free Contraception Requirement Violates Federal Law
Read MoreAbortion Protests, Recess Appointments, and Health Care Reform on the Docket
Read MoreOverview of the Supreme Court’s View of Cellphone Searches
Read MoreJeffrey L. Fisher, Counsel of Record
Read MoreRobert Corn-Revere, Counsel of Record
Read MoreWilliam M. Jay, Counsel of Record
Read MoreChristine M. Levingston Bergman, Counsel of Record
Read MoreDonald B Verrilli, Jr., U.S. Solicitor General
Read MoreGaetan Gerville-Reache, Counsel of Record
Read MoreThe Justices Weigh in on Warrantless Cellphone Searches
Read MoreWarrantless Cellphone Searches Are Unconstitutional
Read MoreThe Court Rules That Town Councils Can Begin Meetings With Christian Prayers
Read MoreThe Court Rules That the Chemical Weapons Convention Does Not Apply to a Woman Poisoning Her Husband
Read MoreThe Court Rules That 35-foot Buffer Zones Around Reproductive Health Facilities Are Unconstitutional
Read MoreThe Court Rules That Short Inter-session Recess Appointments by the President Are Unconstitutional
Read MoreThe Court Rules That the Affordable Care Act’s Free Contraception Requirement Violates Federal Law
Read More©2025 By The Congressional Digest Corporation. All Rights Reserved.