Congressional Digest

Supreme Court Debates March 2002 No. 3 Vol. 5
Before the Court

HMO Coverage Decisions

Contesting "Medical Necessity" of Out-of-Network Treatments

Before the Court

The Justices Weigh in During Oral Arguments

At 10:07 a.m. on January 16, 2001, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments for case number 00-1021, Rush Prudential HMO, Inc. v. Debra C. Moran and the State of Illinois. At 11:05 p.m., arguments concluded and the case was submitted for judgment. Following are excerpts from the arguments of John G. Roberts, Jr., attorney for the Petitioner, and Daniel P. Albers, attorney for Respondent Moran. Questions are presented from the nine Supreme Court justices. Argument on Behalf of Rush Prudential HMO, Inc. MR. ROBERTS: ERISA [Employee Retirement Income Security Act] preemption cases can be exceedingly complicated, but our submission…

More on HMO Coverage Decisions:

Back to top ↑
X
Username
Password

Email Address
Email Address Again
Forgot username/password?