Congressional Digest

Supreme Court Debates May 1999 No. 5 Vol. 2
Before the Court

Law Enforcement and the Media

Reality TV, Media Ride-alongs, and Government Searches

Before the Court

The Justices Weigh in During Oral Arguments

At 10:12 a.m. on March 24, 1999, the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments for case number 97-1927, Rodney C. Hanlon, et al. v. Paul W. Berger, et ux. At 11:32 a.m., arguments concluded and the case was submitted for judgment. Following are excerpts from the arguments of Richard A. Cordray, attorney for Rodney C. Hanlon, et al., and Henry H. Rossbacher, attorney for Paul W. Berger, et ux. Questions are presented from the nine Supreme Court justices. Argument on Behalf of Rodney Hanlon, et al. MR. CORDRAY: The issue is whether law enforcement officials violate the Fourth Amendment…

More on Law Enforcement and the Media:

Back to top ↑
X
Username
Password

Email Address
Email Address Again
Forgot username/password?