Elizabeth B. Prelogar, U.S. Solicitor General
The court of appeals relied on novel and erroneous interpretations of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) and the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) to compel the Department of Homeland Security(DHS) to maintain in perpetuity a discretionary border-management program that the politically accountable executive branch has twice determined to be contrary to the interests of the United States. …
Elizabeth B. Prelogar, U.S. Solicitor General
Read MoreEthan D. Dettmer, Counsel of Record
Read MoreVictoria Dorfman, Counsel of Record
Read MoreJudd E. Stone II, Counsel of Record
Read MoreWalter S. Zimolong III, Counsel of Record
Read MoreChristopher J. Hajec, Counsel of Record
Read MoreKennedy v. Bremerton School District, Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen and Others
Read MoreProcessing Undocumented Migrants at the Border
Read MoreLegality of the Biden Administration’s Immigration Policy Changes
Read MoreThe Justices Weigh in on Repealing the “Remain in Mexico” Policy
Read MoreDefinition of Common Legal Terms Used in Supreme Court Debates
Read More©2024 By The Congressional Digest Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
