The US Supreme Court held that disparate effects on voting do not violate the Voting Rights Act
For the first time, the Supreme Court has issued a decision interpreting Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act (VRA) in the context of state voting rules. …
Representative, South Carolina, Democrat
Read MoreRepresentative, Texas, Democrat
Read MoreSenator, California, Democrat
Read MoreSenator, Minnesota, Democrat
Read MoreSenator, Kentucky, Republican
Read MoreRepresentative, Wisconsin, Republican
Read MoreRepresentative, South Carolina, Republican
Read MoreElection Law Reform Initiative Manager The Heritage Foundation
Read MoreProviding worldwide relief vs. preventing overseas abortion funding
Read MoreGreater transparency vs. privacy breach and administrative burden
Read MoreThe civil rights era legislation that sought to instill voting rights
Read MoreReflecting on the 10th anniversary of the key decision on voting rights
Read MoreModernizing and revitalizing existing voting rights legislation
Read MoreFocusing on election integrity and voter confidence
Read MoreThe US Supreme Court held that disparate effects on voting do not violate the Voting Rights Act
Read MoreCongress considers competing interests on voting rights
Read MoreProviding worldwide relief vs. preventing overseas abortion funding
Read MoreGreater transparency vs. privacy breach and administrative burden
Read More©2024 By The Congressional Digest Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
