Congressional Digest

    Pros and Cons of Defunding the UN

September 23, 2024
Tags:

In December 2023, Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) and Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) introduced the Disengaging Entirely From the United Nations Debacle (DEFUND) Act,  which proposes to withdraw the U.S. from the UN and  stop all U.S. funding to the organization.  

Since then, Republicans have offered several other  proposals, both rhetorically and in 2025 budget proposals,  to defund the UN. 

The U.S. was a key founder of the UN in 1945 and  has been a major financial contributor ever since. In 2022,  the most recent fiscal year with full data available, the  U.S. contributed over $18 billion to the UN, or about a  third of the group’s budget.  

The funding represents about one-fourth of the $70  billion the U.S. spends annually on foreign aid. In introducing the DEFUND Act, Lee argued that the  U.S. has ceded too much power to the UN and that the  organization has failed in its mission to maintain world  peace.  

By supporting the UN, Lee said, “the Biden admin istration continues to fund, indirectly, groups like Hamas  through the United Nations Relief and Works Agency— known for its antisemitic indoctrination.” 

The United Nations Relief and Works Agency  (UNRWA) provides assistance and protection for Palestinian refugees. The UN said it takes “swift action” on  neutrality breaches and that the 66 possible cases it has  investigated out of the 30,000 total UN staff members  “underscores that the absolutely overwhelming majority  of UNRWA’s highly dedicated staff adhere to the principles to which they commit when they join the agency.” 

 The UN said that nine staff members may have been  involved in the Oct. 7 Hamas attack on Israel, and it has  fired all nine individuals.  

Lee also cited the Trump administration’s decision  to halt funding to the United Nations Population Fund  over a Chinese government family planning program that  forces people to get abortions and sterilizations. The UN  agency said it does not support that program.  

The Trump administration acknowledged there was  no evidence to the contrary but claimed that by working  with China’s family planning agency, the UN was tacitly supporting the sterilizations.  

No action has been taken on the DEFUND Act since  its introduction. But on June 3, the Republican-led House Committee on Appropriations released its foreign operations budget for the 2025 fiscal year, which included measures eliminating funding for the UN’s regular budget. In addition, the committee’s foreign operations budget  prohibited funding for the International Court of Justice, the UNRWA, the United Nations Commission of Inquiry  against Israel, the United Nations Population Fund and the  World Health Organization, a UN agency. The committee  approved its 2025 budget on June 12.  

Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart (R-Fla.), chair of the State,  Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Subcommittee  of the House Committee on Appropriations, said, “The  enacted [budget] legislation … defunded antisemitic,  anti-American entities within the United Nations, such  as UNRWA, which has, for many years, been a de facto  subsidiary of Hamas.” 

In contrast, the Senate Committee on Appropriations  budget provided $2.9 billion to fully fund U.S. dues to the  UN and other international commitments, and it increased  funding to recruit and place Americans in entry-level  UN jobs. It continues a funding ban on UNRWA that it  passed in March 2024 as a one-year ban. Congress halted  funding after Israel accused UN staffers of participating  in the Oct. 7 attack. 

The 2025 fiscal year starts Oct. 1, at which point  Congress is supposed to have resolved the differences  between the House and Senate budgets and sent a final  version to President Joe Biden. But Congress often passes extensions when it can’t come to a consensus. (For  instance, the 2024 budget wasn’t finalized until March  2024.) 

Rep. Anna Luna (R-Fla.) published a piece in favor of  defunding the UN, starting with the United Nations Hu man Rights Council. “It has no trouble electing member  nations like China, Cuba, Venezuela and Pakistan to opine  on human rights, despite the fact these nations regularly  engage in the most abysmal actions against humanity  possible,” she wrote. 

Peter Yeo, president of the Better World Campaign,  which supports the partnership between the U.S. and the  UN, said the U.S. would lose leverage and influence by  leaving the UN and defunding the UN would restrict  the U.S.’s ability to push for international sanctions. He  also argued it would be detrimental to defund UN organizations like the World Health Organization, which has  been key to major successes such as eradicating polio and nearly extinguishing smallpox.

X
Username
Password

Email Address
Email Address Again
Forgot username/password?